Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Rumor Mill
 PHA Workers Forum :General :Rumor Mill
Message Icon Topic: Toms Shoes Outlet D Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
wlyb6d55ia
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: May 15 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Quote wlyb6d55ia Replybullet Topic: Toms Shoes Outlet D
    Posted: May 16 2013 at 2:58am
said, “we must have bipartisan support if we want to pass legislation to modernize Medicare and offer prescription drug coverage for all older Americans.” Senators J. Robert Kerrey (D, NE) and Mary Landrieu (D, LA) agree and have co-sponsored his bill. Senator Lieberman himself praised Breaux’s plan as “true to the New Democratic ideals.” Will Gore and Lieberman now cooperate, or will they actually try to kill a measure that would give seniors greater health options – and pharmaceutical coverage — just before an election? Senate Republicans should make them choose. New Jersey’s Robert Toricelli, one of the Senate’s feistiest Democrats, has co-sponsored a measure with Senator Charles Grassley (R, IA) to allow permanent, universal access to medical savings accounts. Today’s MSA law allows no more than 750,000 Americans to dedicate tax-free money for health coverage. Numerous restrictions apply. As Toricelli explained in a July 28 Wall Street Journal column, more than one third of those who have opened MSAs previously lacked health insurance. MSAs, Toricelli wrote,Toms Shoes Outlet, “would provide low-cost coverage to those unable to afford health insurance premiums, and they would guarantee that patients, not insurance companies or health maintenance organizations, have control over health care.” Given Toricelli’s passion, this, too, could pass. Still, many liberals want to keep MSAs outside their highly-regulated medicine chest. Would Gore and Lieberman help their fellow Democrat extend a pro-market medical reform to millions of Americans, or try to block it in favor of big-government medical mandates? Senate Republicans should give them that test. As the Heritage Foundation’s Nina Shokraii Rees reports, 48 percent of Washington D.C.’s 11th graders tested below basic proficiency in reading this year, while 75 percent were below basic in math. School vouchers would help such abused students and their little brothers and sisters. On September 30, 1997, when the Senate last held a roll-call vote to provide $3,200 educational vouchers to 1,800 poor students in Washington’s miserable schools, Democrats Breaux, Landrieu and New York’s Daniel Patrick Moynihan said, “Aye.” And who co-sponsored this educational lifeline? A Democrat named Joseph Lieberman. The Senate should vote on a new D.C. voucher bill. Let America learn whether Gore and Lieberman will join sensible Democrats in honoring their party’s pro-child rhetoric or leave the sons and daughters of the nation’s capitol trapped in the twilight of ignorance. The biggest roadblock to this legislative endgame is that Republicans are too nice. True to form, the reputed party of the rich twirls croquet mallets while Democrats swing Louisville sluggers. In a watershed face-off with a Democrat so statist he makes Walter Mondale look like Steve Forbes, Republicans must play major-league hardball. Passing these bills,Toms Shoes Outlet Store Sale, or at least energetically attempting to do so, will sharpen the distinctions between George W. Bush and Albert Gore and show voters that Republicans are serious about enacting these reforms. Such courage bodes well for the GOP ticket, from top to bottom. The future of the entire free-market agenda is at stake. The time is now for Senate leaders to lead.[标签:标题]
Stonewall Ain t Birmingham And other inconvenient truths about the Scouts. During the Senate debate of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Hubert Humphrey declared that if anyone could find language in the bill that could lead to racial quotas he would “start eating the pages, one after the other, because its not in there.” Thus the story of unintended consequences unfolds. Today, to endorse the language of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or 1965, is invite charges that you’re a racist. Advertisement I wonder if Bill Clinton would have agreed to eat Executive Order13160 had someone said that it would lead to the destruction of the Boy Scouts. Without rehashing the whole story, the Washington Times reported yesterday that a division of the Interior Department is conducting an inqui Related articles:
IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.03
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.266 seconds.