PHA Workers Forum: toms black shoes man job-search and job-readiness

Message

   ing fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and the author of The Tyranny of Clichés. You can write to him by e-mail at JonahsColumn@aol.com, or via Twitter @JonahNRO. ©2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.[标签:标题]
Not So Fast, ‘Fact-Checkers’    To see how Obama gutted welfare reform, just look at the law.  Fact-checkers are disputing my conclusion that the Obama administration gutted the 1996 welfare-reform law by bureaucratic edict.To recap: On July 12, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) put out a memorandum asserting that it would issue waivers exempting state governments from the work requirements established in the 1996 welfare-reform law. According to the directive, in the future neither states nor recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) would be forced to obey the federal “work participation requirements.” The executive fiat flagrantly violated the intent and letter of the reform law.As the summary of the law prepared by Congress shortly after enactment plainly states: “Waivers granted after the date of enactment may not override provisions of the TANF law that concern mandatory work requirements.”But when Mitt Romney declared that Obama’s plan would “gut welfare reform,toms black shoes man,” the mainstream media erupted. The New York Times proclaimed Romney’s statement “blatantly false.” Obama, his media acolytes announced, was merely “tweaking,cheapest toms shoes online,” not “gutting,” the TANF work requirements.   Advertisement  A useful place to begin in deciding whether he is “tweaking” or “gutting” them is the 1996 law itself, which replaced the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program with the TANF program. Section 407 (which Obama claims he can waive lock, stock, and barrel) contains the TANF “work participation requirements.” According to these requirements: 1. Around 30 to 40 percent of the “work eligible” adult TANF caseload in every state are required to engage in work activities.2. Work activities are defined broadly and include: unsubsidized employment; subsidized employment; on-the-job training; up to twelve months of vocational education; community-service work; job-search and job-readiness training; high-school or GED education for recipients under age 20; and high-school or GED education for those 20 and over if combined with other listed activities.3. Individuals are required to engage in these activities for 20 hours per week if a parent has a child under age six in the home and 30 hours per week if all children are six or older.This work-participation framework for TANF is simple and flexible. It allows states a wide range of choices in fulfilling participation standards.If anything,toms glitter black wedges, the TANF work requirements are too lenient. Around half of households receiving TANF payments contain no work-eligible adults and so are fully exempt from federal work requirements. Among work-eligible adults in TANF, half are completely idle each month. Only a quarter of TANF households have any required work activity at all.Backers of the Obama administration’s new policy argue that states need to be exempted from the federal work-participation requirements so that they can send more recipients to college or to extended classes to learn English. But given the fact that, in the typical state, half of work-eligible adult recipients are doing nothing for their payments, states can massively boost college attendance, enrollment in English-language classes, or any other activity without being impeded by the federal work standards.Does the Obama administration merely wish to “tweak” the existing work requirements? In fact, HHS’s illegal waiver edict repeatedly asserts that the administration seeks to exempt states from the law’s “work-participation requirements” and to replace those requirements with new standards devised by HHS without any congressional input. What are those standards? One is called “universal engagement.” Under the section of its executive guidance labeled “HHS Priorities,” the Obama administration explicitlyRelated articles:

http://www.maidenglighting.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=91518

http://ilove0753.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=103195

http://txzylt.com/home/space.php?uid=157356&do=blog&id=1292966

Author	Message
hhf2b3hd3ck Newbie Joined: May 15 2013 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 13	Topic: toms black shoes man job-search and job-readiness Posted: May 16 2013 at 9:33am
	ing fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, and the author of The Tyranny of Clichés. You can write to him by e-mail at JonahsColumn@aol.com, or via Twitter @JonahNRO. ©2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.[标签:标题] Not So Fast, ‘Fact-Checkers’ To see how Obama gutted welfare reform, just look at the law. Fact-checkers are disputing my conclusion that the Obama administration gutted the 1996 welfare-reform law by bureaucratic edict.To recap: On July 12, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) put out a memorandum asserting that it would issue waivers exempting state governments from the work requirements established in the 1996 welfare-reform law. According to the directive, in the future neither states nor recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) would be forced to obey the federal “work participation requirements.” The executive fiat flagrantly violated the intent and letter of the reform law.As the summary of the law prepared by Congress shortly after enactment plainly states: “Waivers granted after the date of enactment may not override provisions of the TANF law that concern mandatory work requirements.”But when Mitt Romney declared that Obama’s plan would “gut welfare reform,toms black shoes man,” the mainstream media erupted. The New York Times proclaimed Romney’s statement “blatantly false.” Obama, his media acolytes announced, was merely “tweaking,cheapest toms shoes online,” not “gutting,” the TANF work requirements. Advertisement A useful place to begin in deciding whether he is “tweaking” or “gutting” them is the 1996 law itself, which replaced the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program with the TANF program. Section 407 (which Obama claims he can waive lock, stock, and barrel) contains the TANF “work participation requirements.” According to these requirements: 1. Around 30 to 40 percent of the “work eligible” adult TANF caseload in every state are required to engage in work activities.2. Work activities are defined broadly and include: unsubsidized employment; subsidized employment; on-the-job training; up to twelve months of vocational education; community-service work; job-search and job-readiness training; high-school or GED education for recipients under age 20; and high-school or GED education for those 20 and over if combined with other listed activities.3. Individuals are required to engage in these activities for 20 hours per week if a parent has a child under age six in the home and 30 hours per week if all children are six or older.This work-participation framework for TANF is simple and flexible. It allows states a wide range of choices in fulfilling participation standards.If anything,toms glitter black wedges, the TANF work requirements are too lenient. Around half of households receiving TANF payments contain no work-eligible adults and so are fully exempt from federal work requirements. Among work-eligible adults in TANF, half are completely idle each month. Only a quarter of TANF households have any required work activity at all.Backers of the Obama administration’s new policy argue that states need to be exempted from the federal work-participation requirements so that they can send more recipients to college or to extended classes to learn English. But given the fact that, in the typical state, half of work-eligible adult recipients are doing nothing for their payments, states can massively boost college attendance, enrollment in English-language classes, or any other activity without being impeded by the federal work standards.Does the Obama administration merely wish to “tweak” the existing work requirements? In fact, HHS’s illegal waiver edict repeatedly asserts that the administration seeks to exempt states from the law’s “work-participation requirements” and to replace those requirements with new standards devised by HHS without any congressional input. What are those standards? One is called “universal engagement.” Under the section of its executive guidance labeled “HHS Priorities,” the Obama administration explicitlyRelated articles: http://www.maidenglighting.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=91518 http://ilove0753.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=103195 http://txzylt.com/home/space.php?uid=157356&do=blog&id=1292966

	IP Logged

yksqshop Newbie Joined: May 17 2013 Location: United Kingdom Online Status: Offline Posts: 4	Posted: May 18 2013 at 7:19am
	According to what normally occasions,roger vivier sale, everybody simply needs to place on a good wear which generally matches the normal putting on a costume in the special occasion one example is Lehenga. The particular gatherings what demand unique wear are weddings or simply any kind of bash which inturn to several countries enjoy United states of america, Pakistan and Bangladesh obtain that being said really serious about being sure that one can find suitable attires being wear that particular day. Lehenga is a sort of clothes and is used for being worn during wedding events for an Indian native bridal use and the like prefer occasions where individuals could consider looking outfit not to mention improve the ground level. Them of different manufacturers what individuals deliver many different evening dresses various appearances whilst they are constructed of the exact same substance. When you shop,トリーバーチ財布, one is required to refer to the particular artist for easy i . d. Referfing to some types of Lehenga wedding gowns comprise of; 2.Panelled Benarasi Brocade Lehenga: One of these saris slip on most likely the splendid checking clothes along with heavy pink coloured or a purple pallette colorations and therefore encrafted that has resham,Red Bottom Shoes, sequins, zari,roger vivier shoes, applique together with repair circumference employment. It splendid actually feel from its touch which is a result of typically the embroidery function accomplished by kasab also bulb leading. Due to the fact is offered in plenty of sizings,トリーバーチ靴, one can get the greatest scale 38inches more likely than not associated with brocade choli with the help of rich yellow netting dupatta in most stock options. 2.Violet online Knack Lehenga: This amazing British salwar kameez is constucted from diamond,roger vivier shoes shop online, sequins and therefore salma deliver the results and it is cellular lining is normally absolutely pure fabric producing optimal potency. In many different investments,トリーバーチ靴, you can get a lot 60inches overall size where by large and impressive will start with 44inches. Generally speaking, customers provide your requirements to allow them to make with this type of lehenga outfit. Three or more.Synthetic Georgette Paneled Lehenga: Is fabulous due to off white combined with pigmented white colorations and is particularly garnished having resham, cutdana, sequins, pure stone and even globules function this particular a model of some rose style. It provides a the front unlock granting the situation a special browse many of us that's desirable to a large amount of women of all ages. Six.World wide web a good Brand lehenga Choli: Generally pink and then environment friendly in color actually being encrafted by using resham,roger vivier flats online, sequins, zari or anything else. Furthermore this is that's lehenga of its kind mutually can adjust the hip to health in turn is without a doubt bendable and people with different shape lengths and widths could certainly use it. The best dimensions are relating to Thirty-six to make sure you Thirty eight inches wide which has a amount of 46inches and even offers small distinctions colored. It is possible to often identify various kinds Native indian sarees beyond the an individual's outlined but one issue there's no need which will tend to forget within shopping stands out as the performer of this attire. For a site visitor, prehaps you are located in from the talked about locations for which you won't be able to get this garments and you really are wanting them all,buy red bottom shoes, how do you find them? The best solution for this purpose is definitely making a web based acquisition wherever specs are required for proper name of this dress of which hoaxes difficult in naming will need maker arrives in. I am sure purchasing of the sarees,Christian Louboutin Shoes, proof information and facts is too presented where by costs can be achieved when labor and birth and when you get that could be performed, all the jobs you possibly can recover each of them on top of your front door. The manufacturers of an suits or even merchants advertising individuals accomplish that towards very affordable estimates for you to are able of experiencing the best wear for that wedding ceremony and party. Lehenga attire is quite common in the world today in a range of contemporary wedding arrangements and this society is without a doubt intending much. Related articles: http://video.gellarfan.org/members/dvdbkc349 http://bbs.nrztx.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=41594 http://occupymovies.com/read_blog/99817/urban-fashion-street-wear-the-city-look http://bulkdatafeeds.ca/upload/view/post:94586
	IP Logged