's Court of second instance the second hearing,hollister, Huizhou City Public Security Bureau Detachment and of Huizhou IRS investigators be required to appear in court on case handling situation. It is understood, Cai Huiling previously served as the general manager of Huizhou Ogilvy & Mather Environmental Science and Technology Co,hollister., Ltd. in September 2011, accused of forging VAT receipts by Huicheng District Court of First Instance. According to the prosecution allegations, he served as general manager of Ogilvy & Mather Environmental Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Huizhou City,moncler, Cai Huiling instructed subordinates VAT invoices 18, a total of more than 200 million of ad valorem tax to offset tax of 29 million yuan,hollister deutschland, constitute falsifying VAT invoices sin,louboutin. Huicheng District Court sentenced Cai Huiling 4 years in prison, Cai Huiling, appeal to the Huizhou Intermediate People's Court. Recently, Huizhou City Intermediate People's Court of second instance, the first hearing of the evidence to be challenged in court. The day before the second hearing,louboutin, the court investigation of the evidence submitted by the relevant handling department, Huizhou Municipal Public Security Bureau of Economic Investigation Detachment, Huizhou City,hollister, the IRS and the IRS Huicheng District 5 attendance of witnesses, otherwise, who did not appear in court,louboutin pas cher, the former Ogilvy The special financial officers of the Company issued a written testimony. During prosecution original handling the case evidence has always been the Public Security Bureau of Economic Investigation and the state tax department investigators confirm Cai Huiling attorney asked on both sides of the evidence in the time and Economic Investigation and the National Tax investigators' time . Stage of the debate in the courts, the prosecution believes that after an investigation proved the the investigators handling process are carried out in accordance with the law, the evidence is true and reliable, first-instance penalty was appropriate. Cai Huiling's attorney argued that the source of clues about the case,moncler outlet, the public security organs with the tax authorities buck each. Public security authorities said the Inland Revenue Department to provide them with the crime clues, the Inland Revenue Department crime clues provided by the public security organs and the City Commission for Discipline Inspection to them,parajumpers, the course of the trial, the public security authorities and tax authorities in respect of the transfer of cases time at each other on the middle separated ten days time,hollister france. The prosecution countered that the law enforcement agencies and the executive authorities handling the case and do not subordinate, can be independently handling the case,hollister, should not be required in the case handover time absolutely consistent,air jordan. The Court has yet to make a second trial on the case.

Related articles:

• >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
• Original title
• this reporter to the Tunchang County