|
's reason: RUAN have Lin in 1993 and divorce, but the name of the building, is the two marital relationship during the existence of the common property, http://www.afenligne.fr - abercrombie france , and the the original couple divorced, also is not on this listing The split, he filed Subrogation Litigation --- Chen Lin's estate shares on behalf of Lin and her ex-husband Mr Yuen split after 16 years of "re-separation. The old couple standing in the same "front" Licheng Court accepted the case, Lin subsequently by the court added as a defendant, the two sides subsequently court. In court, http://www.roadrunner-card.com/hollistershop.html - hollister , Mr Yuen's attorney believes that this house is the ancestral heritage property, and divorce before the convention belongs to Mr. Ruan personal all. At the same time, he also took out a right of inheritance notary, building property is the legacy left by Mr Nguyen father. Since July 1993, Nguyen's ex-wife, Lin, have been building houses do not enjoy any rights. To say the least, even if the house is a common property, but under the law, the parties request to split matrimonial property litigation aging 2 years. Ex-wife Lin appointed attorney appear in court, the ex-husband on this side views of the same standing. The Lin a party point of view, real estate, this is the ex-husband's personal property, not matrimonial, http://www.searchmedica.co.uk/mulberryoutlet.htm - mulberry outlet . In 1993, the two sides are going to divorce, and covenanted all of this property owned by Mr. Ruan. Therefore, Chen not eligible for a suit to enforce its right of subrogation. Case proceedings, http://www.oakleylunettev88.fr - oakley , the plaintiff Chen in addition to stick to their point of view, also apply to the court for a commissioned real estate appraisal agencies to assess the value of building real estate, http://www.mulberryoutletvstore88.co.uk - mulberry , last estimated at more than 420,000 yuan, http://www.louboutinpaschere88.fr - louboutin . The house is still vested in her ex-husband, but need to compensate ex-wife 210,000 Licheng court building property during the existence of the relationship between husband and wife, Mr. Ruan and Lin, New, inheritance, gift, http://www.afenligne.fr - abercrombie , analysis, http://www.hollisterparis88.fr - hollister paris , changes in acquired property, houses in Although the duration of the marriage of the two defendants is registered in the name of Mr Yuen, Mr. Ruan the inheritance rights notary, but can not prove that building property is personal property acquired by Mr. Ruan as a husband. Therefore, building real estate should be recognized as a couple of the marital relationship of the two defendants during the existence of the common property, http://www.roadrunner-card.com/hollistershop.html - hollister shop . The two defendants in the divorce is not divided on this common property, http://www.neweysonline.co.uk/customize.html - abercrombie . Chen as application executor under the law can sue on behalf of Lin, http://www.abrugby.fr/pub/abercrombie-france.aspx - abercrombie , the division of property. In view of the property registered in the name of Mr. Ruan, and manager of its use, the Court angle of departure from conducive to the protection of the interests of creditors, made a verdict. The verdict is that the housing is still vested in Mr Nguyen, Mr Yuen to come up with half of the assessment of the total amount of housing discounts compensation Lin, which is more than 210,000 yuan. After the verdict, Mr Yuen, appeal to the Quanzhou Intermediate People's Court. Recently, the Quanzhou Intermediate People's Court of second instance upheld the conviction. □ Judge interpretation subrogation Property Litigation "in such cases is the first case in Licheng, Mr. Chen to bring subrogation Property litigation, based on the Supreme Court on the provisions of the" People's Court civil execution, seizure, seizure, freezing property this provisions, to help the court to resolve the problem of an execution. "Yesterday, people of Licheng court a judge in chambers Wenfang, the provisions of Article XIV, judicial interpretation in the form of the creation of a new type of litigation, is enforceable in creditors v. Property (application executor) subrogation. Under fourteen, the first paragraph of the executed and others Total property, the court may seal, http://www.louboutinpaschere88.fr - louboutin pas cher , seizure, freezing and promptly notify the co-owners; stipulated in the third paragraph, mention the analysis of production suit or applying executor The subrogation filed Property litigation, the people's court shall permit.
Related articles:
- http://athletestatus.com/2012/06/does-desean-jackson-owe-more-money-than-he-has/ - then on "Li Ying
- http://www.clicknewz.com/15/blogger-to-wordpress/ - go to the Children's Hospital of Zhengzhou City
- http://www.optpages.com/asfh86ompvix/2013/03/09/or-property-maintenance-experience-preferred/ - or property maintenance experience preferred
|