It acknowledges US research which consistently shows that "children who grow up in an 'intact, two-parent family' with both biological parents do better on a wide range of outcomes than children who grow up in a single-parent family, http://www.chanelpascher.org/ - Chanel Femme ."
But in the end, the report treats "changes to families", http://www.saccelinefrance.com/ - Celine France ; as merely changes, ", http://www.chanelpascher.org/ - Chanel Pas Cher ;trends that are unlikely to reverse" (because they belong to the "evolution" of society?), and indeed ought not to be corrected because that "skews resources away from single-parent families, http://www.saclouisvuitton1.com/ - Sac Louis Vuitton , who tend to be most in need of financial support, and is unnecessarily morally prescriptive.", http://www.louisvuittonpascher-sacs.com/ - Sac Louis Vuitton Pas Cher ;
Unnecessary, because other research has shown that "marital status matters much less than many other factors in determining whether couples stay together" and that "children growing up in non-traditional family forms can succeed if warmth, stability and consistent parenting are present." IPPR's solutions therefore ring the changes on the status quo: welfare and state parenting.
Related articles:
- http://venus68.info/viewthread.php?tid=700491&extra= - http://venus68.info/viewthread.php?tid=700491&extra=
- http://minibay.wiselinc.com/showtopic-581982.aspx - http://minibay.wiselinc.com/showtopic-581982.aspx
|